In October 2016 I was asked to give an address at the CreatEd conference at Bradford College. The event was for trainee teachers from the McMillan Faculty of Education, their tutors, and external visitors from the local arts and education sectors. The conference included speakers from the Bradford Museums and Galleries, a representative of CapeUK (now IVE) an arts brokering service, and a fantastic choir from Fox Hill Primary School. As the point of getting everyone together was to promote creative education, I decided that as the address was to be given at the opening of the event, it should be a provocation; something to get the delegates thinking, and that might stay with them throughout the day.
What follows is an edited version of that address: A Clarion Call for Creativity
Imagine a world without imagination. Imagine a world without art, or music, or
poetry or design. Imagine a world without ideas. Think of a world without original thought. Imagine a world without creativity.
“Creativity is intelligence having fun” – Albert Einstein
The great Sir Ken Robinson defines creativity as, “The process of having
original ideas that have value.” He says that it differs from imagination, the ability to bring to mind things that aren’t present, in that creativity involves doing something. The problem that we face is in the question of who determines the ‘value’ of the creative process. Not, it would seem, successive recent Governments or their education advisors. Yet creativity and the many ‘ soft skills’; curiosity, resilience, and flexibility of thinking that are linked with it, are amongst those most highly valued by employers across the world.
On a global scale, without the different ways that creative thought and the creative process are expressed, we would have no cultural identities. We would have no stories to tell, no means of marking the milestones in our lives, and no sense of who we are and what our relationship is with the world. Our lives would be immeasurably poorer for that. I am sure that no-one here would wish to live in a mono-culture – although this seems to be one of the goals of Western materialist consumerism. It is merely the illusion of choice. Knock me out in one large shopping centre and wake me up in another one, would I be able to tell the difference? To limit creativity, to mistrust original thought, to stamp out difference of opinion by calling it dissent is nothing short of fascism.
But I am sure that I am preaching to the Choir here. I may not tell you anything that you don’t know already (so why am I here?) but as Isaac Asimov wrote; “I come here to light a candle in the sunshine” It might add a little to the
brightness. However, I do hope to sound a clarion call for creativity: to agitate and provoke you into action.
As I mentioned just now, a world without creativity is, to me, unthinkable. It is our desire and ability to express our thoughts, ideas and feelings in diverse ways that make us human. To create something new, to imagine the impossible and make it possible, without that impulse we would never progress – we might even say that we would not evolve. “This is all well and good”, you might be thinking, “all very noble but a bit arty-farty. What value does creativity actually have?” I return to my opening remarks and ask you to imagine a world without creativity or design. For a start I would be standing here, naked, in an empty room, in the dark, talking to myself. The Creative Industries are the second largest sector in the UK economy, only just behind the financial services, and were the only sector of the economy that did not go into recession following the financial crash of 2008. Figures from 2014 showed that the Creative Industries were worth £ 84.1bn to the UK economy. We lead the world in design skills, and innovation. TV and Film production with both Downton Abbey and Dr Who conquering the
world’s airwaves, fashion design, textiles, visual arts, product design – look at Apple, the most successful brand on the planet, and whose head of design, Jonathan Ive, is British – music – Adele’s third album, 25, topped 7 million sales in under five weeks, (it now hovers somewhere around the 17.5 million mark) and her second album 21 is the fourth biggest seller of any release by a
UK artist. Hands up who owns an Adele cd. Not bad for someone with only a passing knowledge of consonants. Let’s not mention Coldplay whose total worldwide record sales top 80 million.
So, where do all the actors, artists, choreographers, dancers, directors, editors, fashion designers, games developers, graphic designers, journalists, lighting designers, make-up artists, musicians, painters, production designers, songwriters, theatre technicians, and wardrobe assistants all come from?
Where do we provide the opportunities to engage with creative subjects? The EBACC is not the place. This performance measure for schools is awarded when a pupil secures a C grade or above in GCSE English, maths, history or
geography, the sciences or a foreign language. It was introduced six years ago but made compulsory for all pupils who started year 7 in September 2015. The worry is that schools will focus only on what they are being measured on and that this coupled with limited resources will squeeze out arts subjects. OFQUAL, the exams regulator, reports a five-fold drop in the take up
of arts GCSEs in the last year alone. That equates to somewhere in the region of 46,000 students. The knock on effect of this is a slump in the number of people going on to study the arts at University or specialist Conservatoires. This is especially the case in young people from less-affluent backgrounds. This narrowing of the curriculum in schools, especially in poorly funded, oversubscribed, over-stretched state schools, is limiting these opportunities further. The reduction and removal of funding to arts providers, out of school provision, and charities is a further attack. The austerity argument is that the arts are a luxury that the nation can ill afford. Winston Churchill is reputed to have said when, in a cabinet meeting during the war, one of his ministers suggested a cut to the arts budget, ”Then, what are we fighting for?”
If children and young people are not able to engage with creative expression as part of their education then we are not giving them an education worth having.
As you are all no doubt aware, children first learn through play. Play and creativity go hand-in-hand, and, like creativity, play can sometimes be viewed as secondary to learning in a formal education setting. Indeed play is sometimes viewed as a triviality; ‘merely playing’, ‘just playing at it’, ‘a bit of a play boy’. But play is a crucial ingredient in learning. Play, in all its forms feeds the creative process; imitative play, object play, word play, and, perhaps most beneficial of all to a child’s development, physical play.
In our increasingly risk-averse and technology driven world we are reducing our children’s opportunities to run and jump and climb, to explore and expand their physical capabilities. No time to play in lessons, no space to play either indoors or out. One report from 2015 stated that applications to sell off school playing fields were being approved at the rate of one every two weeks. More screen time means that our children are at risk of becoming unhealthy, both physically and mentally. A lack of exposure to sunlight, parents driving their children to school, and more time spent indoors playing computer games has resulted in an increase in cases of rickets, that most Victorian of diseases.
NHS figures from 2013 show that there were 833 hospital admissions for children suffering from the condition. Recent research from Canada suggests that children’s attachment to electronic devices is diminishing their ability to connect with their parents and peers. They are becoming disengaged from conversations, the ‘back-and-forth’ of family life, which is impeding the development of their broader social skills. Increases in child obesity and diabetes, and more and more instances of children showing symptoms of anxiety and depression are a shameful testament to our lack of care. One in ten children aged between 5 and 16 have a diagnosable mental health disorder. That is three in every average class. At a conference organised by a faculty named in her honour, it is worth remembering, and celebrating, the contribution made by Margaret McMillan to the welfare of Bradford’s children. She was instrumental in realising the benefits not only of a good education but
also the importance of developing children’s physical wellbeing through exercise and good diet.
I am not suggesting that we can solve the myriad and complex social and personal problems faced by some of our learners with a bit of singing and dancing and a tub of glitter. But it might help. The arts offer us all the opportunity to engage with issues and fears; to share the experiences of others and gain empathy. They allow us to express our emotions, to celebrate our similarities through shared experiences, or to rejoice in our differences.
Martha Graham, the American dancer and choreographer and one of the founding figures in contemporary dance put it like this, “The body says what words cannot. Dance is the hidden language of the soul, of the body”
I know that, shortly, you will be treated to an example of the work of Kala Sangam, one of several arts organisations in Bradford that promote the use of the arts to enrich our understanding of different cultures. In doing so they bring young people (and not so young people) together to share in the joy and beauty of poetry, music, art and dance. Mind The Gap work with learning disabled actors and performers to tell their stories, to share their experiences, and to inspire us and remind us that we all have a place on the stage. Dance United are another organisation that transform the lives of young people and
their families through the arts. Working with young people who are, or are at risk of being, involved with the youth justice system, Dance United use contemporary dance to offer structure, routine and discipline to people whose lives can often be chaotic. If you have not had the pleasure of seeing the work of these three companies then I urge you to do so at the earliest opportunity.
The benefits to children and young people of participating in the arts are clear to those of us who work in the field. We see increases in the levels of self-confidence, empathy, problem solving, teamwork, and communication skills. Some of the side benefits are seen in improvements in literacy levels,reasoning skills, physical and mental agility, and resilience. In the current system of test, test, teach to the test, there is little or no room for failure. AsKen Robinson says: “We stigmatize mistakes. Now we are running national education systems where mistakes are the worst things that you can make… and the result is that we are educating people out of their creative capacities.”
And some children can’t handle the fact that they have ‘failed’. The arts allow us to experience failure not as a catastrophe but as a catalyst for change. “If you have never failed at anything then you have never learned.”
How many of the children and young people in our care are denied the opportunity to discover their passions because the schooling system and the pressures of the modern world aim to constrict them? And what are we going
to do about it?
We need to overhaul the education system so that play and creativity are at the heart of the curriculum across all stages. We need to find ways of embedding creativity into the teaching and learning processes. Robinson again, “If you have a more dynamic approach to teaching and learning, if you promote links between disciplines, if you set creative questions for kids to
explore, if you engage their curiosity, if you nurture their imaginations – they become more fully involved and excited about learning and their achievement levels go up. It is a human process, not a mechanical process.”
This needs to happen from the Early Years Foundation stage through Primary school, into Secondary school and onwards into further and higher education, and to carry on into employment. How many of us feel that we have the abilit to be creative in our work roles? How supported are we in this by the institutions in which we work?
So, who is going to effect the necessary change? “Here’s looking at you, kid!” As teachers you have a crucial role to play in the development of the children in your charge. I might even go so far as to say that, along with doctors and
nurses, you have a vital role. You have the responsibility of nurturing those children, nourishing their souls as well as their minds. A good teacher can make life bearable for a child; a bad teacher can make it unbearable. We all remember the teachers that inspired us, or believed in us, or listened to us.
It is down to each and every one of us to fight for the arts in education. It is down to each and every one of us to allow our students to be creative. It is our duty to stay curious ourselves, to be as excited about learning as we would
hope our students will be. To be prepared to take risks. To be prepared to stand in front of a class and say, “I don’t know the answer to that…but let’shave fun finding out together”. It will be a challenge to take on the system. Don’t get overwhelmed by the enormity of the task. Be comforted by the fact that you can take small steps, positive steps, and still effect the change. By implementing minor changes you can make a difference; the small steps are manageable, and will be recognised by others as something that are possible for them too. You can also monitor the effects and reflect on the process, adapting it as you go.
Small, effective changes are preferable to grandiose, sweeping reforms that destroy much more than they create.
Collaboration is key in most creative endeavours so find your self a group of like-minded people to share ideas with, and give and get support. Be generous with your ideas. Be generous with your praise and encouragement
of others. Be kind to yourself.
I hope that at least some of the above resonates with you, and I would like to read your feedback. Thank you.